A
few excerpts from Fundamental
Thoughts in Economics will suffice to make this point. Cassel was
highly skeptical of political power and believed that economic analysis was
necessary to check the efforts to expand government's scope when that expansion
was unwarranted and the goals of the expansion were unrealistic.
The observance of
this rule [to minimize assumptions in modeling] enables us to determine the
degree to which economic conditions are independent of social order. In fact,
this is the only way by which science can effectively oppose popular overvaluation
of political power. But such a study of social economy is also of great
importance for science itself, in as much as it is an aid for penetrating
deeper into the true nature of important economic phenomena. It is sometimes
useful to form an idea of how certain feature of our actual economic life would
present themselves in a hypothetical, purely socialistic society, with the
whole production centralized in the hands of a single authority, and what
modifications the phenomena would thereby undergo. Such an investigation shows
that the dogmatic socialists' belief in the radically transforming effect of
their social order on the essential economic phenomena is quite groundless, and
in fact represents a superstitious overvaluation of political power."
(25-26)
He even consider
calculation under a socialist system in The Theory of Social Economy. His definition of socialism is somewhat vague, but he does consider the limits of economic planning,
In our economic
system, the work of directing production in conformity with the requirements of
consumers falls principally upon the entrepreneurs. This task is by no means so
simple as Socialists imagine when they say that all that is necessary is to
compile statistics of wants in advance and then officially to regulate
production on the basis of these statistics. Regulating consumption in this
manner would be equivalent, in a large degree, to suppressing the freedom of
choice. of consumption that is characteristic of the exchange economy. But the
consumers wish most decidedly to retain this freedom of choice to the last
moment.
The difficulty of the
problem lies precisely in the fact that the constantly varying demands of
consumers, which cannot be determined in advance with any degree of certainty,
must be satisfied, despite incessant changes in the methods and conditions of
production. This work is actually done - naturally not perfectly - by a number
of independent entrepreneurs, each of whom, on the whole, looks merely
to his own interest.
This solution of the
problem is possible because, whenever a want that can be paid for is left
unsatisfied, or is not completely satisfied, or satisfied only at an abnormally
high price - every time, that is, the problem of the 'economic direction of
social production' is not satisfactorily solved - an entrepreneur is encouraged
by the prospect of earning a special profit to make a better provision for the want in question, and
the productive process is thus steadily improved. The entrepreneur intervenes,
not only where something is to be done for the immediate satisfaction of
consumers' wants, but everywhere where the productive process, somewhere among
the thousands of its component processes, exhibits a gap which leaves room for
his enterprise. In this way, all these partial processes are united into a
single productive process, embracing the entire satisfaction of wants in the
exchange economy. (171)
Notice that, even
though Cassel was a general equilibrium theorist who loved the specificity
provided by math, he was very clear that economics is about humans acting. He
even emphasizes the entrepreneur, yet does not receive a citation, as far as I
have looked, in Israel Kirzner’s Market
Theory and the Price System. A search through the index of Human Action reveals that Cassel is mentioned once: only indirectly via a citation. The more I the study economists that practiced
prior to the Keynesian era, the more I believe that the Austrian school has harmed
itself by not fully employing the ideas of these potential intellectual allies. If anyone knows of a story as pertaining to this apparent separation, I would love to learn more.
Related Posts
The Role of the Entrepreneur: Coordination and Innovation
2015-02-03
Entrepreneurs guide production according to the needs of consumers. Remember that a good is a typ e of object
whose definition is a subjective. The final consumer must expect that the good
will improve his or her position enough that he or she actually purchases the
good. The entrepreneur’s role is to provide that good to the consumer. Note the
inherent difficulty in this role. Consumer demand is...
Read more
Building Micro-foundations: Rules, Entrepreneurship, and Emergent Macro
2014-05-12
In
considering the appropriate framework for modeling a macroeconomics of market
processes, consider two Austrian suppositions: humans act purposively and all
social and economic phenomena are the result of individual action. As I have
suggested before, a rule-based macroeconomics can include both of these. It allows
us to include the entrepreneur in our analysis. As equilibrium is not part...
Read more
A theory of social economy II: reformulating a framework for economic analysis
2017-01-18
In his Principles
of Economics , Carl Menger tells us that his goal is to “reduce the
complex phenomena of human economic activity to the simplest elements that can
still be subjected to accurate observation, to apply to these elements the
measure corresponding to their nature, and constantly adhering to this measure,
to investigate the manner in which the more complex economic phenomena...
Read more